幾種化學(xué)農(nóng)藥和生物農(nóng)藥對(duì)稻縱卷葉螟田間藥效評(píng)價(jià)比較

打開文本圖片集

中圖分類號(hào)S482.3文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼A文章編號(hào) 0517-6611（2025）11-0130-03

doi ： 10.3969/j .issn.0517-6611.2025.11.028

開放科學(xué)（資源服務(wù)）標(biāo)識(shí)碼（OSID）：

ComparisonofFieldEficacyofSveral ChemicalPesticidesandBiopesticidesAgainstRiceLeafBorer，Cnaphalocrocismedinalis ZHAOYun-xia，ZHANGXue-feng，TANG Yi-tingetal（HuaiinAgriculturalScienceResearch Institute/NationalAgriculturalScience Huai’an Observation and Experiment Station，Huai'an，Jiangsu 223001）

AbstractCnaplocrocisednalisisorantstfetigiceodtio，tlarifefieldctroltofdientds CnaphalocrocisdlisspptedhicalstdsopsidfeldpetCaalocisalse results showed that the field efficacy of 150g/L indoxacarb SC had excellent preventive effect against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis，with the insecticidal effect and leaf preservation effect are above 90% at 7and 14d afterspraying the pesticides.The insecticidal effect and leaf preservation effect of 35% chlorantraniliprole WG and 10% tetrachlorantraniliprole SC were above 80% at 7 and 14 d after spraying. The field efficacy of 5% emamectin benzoate ME in biopesticides was the best，followed by 25% spinetoram WG，and these two pesticides had a slightly poorer effct on leaf preservation compared with indoxacarb，but the insecticidal effct were more than 90% . The insecticidal and leaf preservation effects of 20% spinoasad SC and 5% avermectin EC were also above 80% at 7 and 14d after spraying，whereas 8 000 IU/ μl of Bt SC was slightly less efective against Cnaphalocrocismedinalis in the field.In conclusion，except for Bt ，the field efficacy of the selected biopesticidesagistCaplococisedinlisisompabletatfcalpstidditiscoeddattab alternately and in rotation with indoxacarb for the field control of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis.

Key wordsCnaphalocrocis medinalis ; Biopesticide;Chemical pesticide;Field control efficiency

稻縱卷葉螟（CnaphalocrocismedinalisGuenée）俗稱刮青蟲、卷葉蟲，屬鱗翅目螟蛾科，是對(duì)水稻最具破壞性的害蟲之_[1]。（剩余4744字）