《道路交通安全法》第76條存廢問題研究

中圖分類號：D922.14 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼：A 文章編號：1004-0714（2025）07-0125-06

Abstract：In 1999，Shenyang took the lead inenactinglocal regulations stipulating the principleof“no liabilityevenifanaccidentinvolvesaviolation，”which sparkedextensivediscussion.The2003RoadTraffic Safety Lawimposedanear no-faultliabilityondrivers，again drawing significant debate.Finally，in 2007， thelawwas amended toa presumed-faultliability model，requiring that evenincases where the motorist is faultless，they must bear up to 10% of the responsibility. This legislative evolution illustrates the ongoingtension between efficiencyand justice，whichisnot static but developswith societal progress.Despite theseamendments，thedilemma of balancingefficiencyand justiceintrafficsafetyhasnotbeen fullyresolved.Givenchanging social conditions-suchas thelegal foundationof Article76，the balance of power amongtrafficparticipants，thefrequencyand severityofaccidents，road trafficconditions，and judicial practice-itwould betteralignwithcurrent societal views onefficiency and justicetorepeal Article76of the Road Traffic Safety Law.

Keywords：Efficiency;Justic;Road TrafficSafety;RighttoLife

一、引言

1999年8月30日，沈陽市人民政府率先發(fā)布《沈陽市行人與機(jī)動車道路交通事故處理辦法》，規(guī)定非機(jī)動車、行人與機(jī)動車發(fā)生交通事故，前者違反交通規(guī)則，機(jī)動車無過錯的，由非機(jī)動車、行人一方負(fù)全部責(zé)任，引起了全社會的廣泛討論，被稱為“行人違章撞了也白撞”。（剩余11715字）