0.05 );R組內(nèi)臟牽拉反應(yīng)發(fā)生率低于P組,麻醉起效時(shí)間早于P組,鎮(zhèn)痛維持時(shí)間長(zhǎng)于P組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義( P<0.05 )。R組術(shù)后VAS評(píng)分低于P組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義( P<0.05 )。兩組不良反應(yīng)總發(fā)生率比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義( P>0.05 )。結(jié)論:與單獨(dú)使用羅哌卡因相比,羅哌卡因聯(lián)合舒芬太尼蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔阻滯麻醉用于PPH患者中效果更好,內(nèi)臟牽拉反應(yīng)發(fā)生率更低,麻醉起效時(shí)間更早,鎮(zhèn)痛維持時(shí)間更長(zhǎng),更能降低患者術(shù)后的疼痛程度,且安全性較好。-龍?jiān)雌诳W(wǎng)" />

特黄三级爱爱视频|国产1区2区强奸|舌L子伦熟妇aV|日韩美腿激情一区|6月丁香综合久久|一级毛片免费试看|在线黄色电影免费|国产主播自拍一区|99精品热爱视频|亚洲黄色先锋一区

羅哌卡因聯(lián)合舒芬太尼蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔阻滯麻醉在PPH患者中的應(yīng)用效果

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功


打開文本圖片集

Application Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Sufentanil Subarachnoid Block Anesthesia in Patients with PPH/WU Huiqing, DENG Yuan, YANG Jianfa.//Medical Innovation of China, 2025, 22(11): 121-124

[Abstract]Objective:To observe the effect of Ropivacaine combined with Sufentanil subarachnoid block anesthesia in procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH).Method: A total of 102 patients who underwent PPH in Ruijin People's Hospital from April 2022 to March 2024 were selected as the study objects and divided into groupP and group R according to random number table method,with 51patients in each group.Subarachnoid block of Ropivacaine was performed in group P, and subarachnoid block of Ropivacaine combined with Sufentanil was performed in group R.The superior and good rateof anal relaxation,the incidence of visceral pull reaction, the degree of lower extremity motor nerve block (Bromage score),the onsettime of anesthesia and the duration of analgesia were comparedbetween the two groups.Postoperative visualanalogue scale(VAS)scores and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between thetwo groups. Result:There were no significant diffrences in the excellent and good rate of anal relaxation and Bromage score between the two groups ( P >0.05). The incidence of visceal pullreaction in group Rwaslower than that in group P, the onset time of anesthesia was earlier than that in group P,and the duration of analgesia was longer than that in group P,thediffrences were statistically significant ( P <0.05). The VAS score of group R was lower than that of group P, the diffrence was statistically significant( P <0.05).There was no significant diference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups ( P >0.05). Conclusion: Compared with Ropivacaine alone, Ropivacaine combined with Sufentanil subarachnoid block anesthesia has better eects in PPH patients,with lower incidence of visceral pull reaction, earlier onsettime of anesthesia,longer duration of analgesia,andcanreduce the degreeof postoperative pain, with better safety.

[Key words] Ropivacaine Sufentanil Subarachnoid block Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids First-author's address: Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin People's Hospital, Ruijin 34250o, China doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2025.11.027

近年來(lái),隨著微創(chuàng)手術(shù)技術(shù)的不斷發(fā)展和完善,吻合器痔上黏膜環(huán)切術(shù)(PPH)作為一種治療內(nèi)痔和混合痔的微創(chuàng)手術(shù)方法,受到了廣泛關(guān)注-2]。(剩余6283字)

目錄
monitor