眼部疼痛評估問卷的漢化及信效度檢驗

打開文本圖片集

AbstractObjective：TotranslatetheOcularPainAssessment Survey（OPAS）intoChinese，andtotestitsreliabilityandvalidity. Methods：TheEnglishversionofOPASwastranslatedfolowingtheBrislintranslationmodel.Expertswereinvitedtomakecultural adaptationsforitfterprenvestigation，theChineseversionofOPASwasformed.Byusingtheconvenientsamplingmetodtotalf 367outpatientsitingtedryeyeutpatintdepartmentofaetarygradeAophthalmologyspelisthospitalinJiangxiprovncefrom FebruarytoJune2O24wereselectedforivestigation，totesthereliabilityandvalidityoftheChineseversionofOPAS.Results：The ChineseversionofPSincludedfivedimensions：eyepainintensityoneyepain，qualityoflife，aggravatingfactors，ndrelated factors，withatotalof22items.Exploratoryfactoranalysisextractedfivecommonfactors.Andthecumulativecontributionrateof variance was 68.361% .Confirmatory factoranalysis showed thatallindexes of the model were inthe acceptablerange.Thescale-level contentvlidityidex（S-CVI）was0.973.Andtheitem-levelcontentvalidityindex（I-CVI）rangedfrom0.818to1.oo.Thecoelation coeficientbetweenthetotalscoreoftheChineseversionofOPASandthescoreoftheWong-BakerFacesPainScaleRevision（FPS-R） wasO.621.ThetotalCronbach'sacoeficientofthescalewasO.9O4.AndtheGuttmansplit-alfreliabilitywasO.846.Concusions：The ChineseversionofOPAShas god elabilityandvalidity.Itcouldbeusedasatoolforevaluatingocularpain inophthalmicpatients in China.

Keywordseye pain; dry eye;quality of life;reliability;validity;scale research摘要目的：將眼部疼痛評估問卷（OPAS）進行漢化并檢驗其信效度。（剩余9744字）