CO2點(diǎn)陣激光和強(qiáng)脈沖光治療面部光老化的療效比較
打開(kāi)文本圖片集
【摘 要】目的 對(duì)CO2點(diǎn)陣激光和強(qiáng)脈沖光治療面部光老化的效果進(jìn)行比較。方法 選取我院2017年1月-2018年1月收治的面部光老化患者100例，隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組及觀察組，各50例。對(duì)照組行強(qiáng)脈沖光治療，觀察組行CO2點(diǎn)陣激光治療，比較兩組治療效果、不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率及復(fù)發(fā)率。結(jié)果 觀察組治療總有效率為96.00%，高于對(duì)照組的84.00%（P
【關(guān)鍵詞】CO2點(diǎn)陣激光；強(qiáng)脈沖光；面部光老化
中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)：R782.2 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A 文章編號(hào)：1004-4949（2023）08-0001-03
Comparison of the Efficacy of CO2 Fractional Laser and Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Facial Photoaging
WANG Lin1， CAO Yan-lin2
（1.Laser Medical Center of Yunnan First People’s Hospital， Kunming 650000， Yunnan， China； 2.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery， the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University， Kunming 650000， Yunnan， China）
【Abstract】Objective To compare the efficacy of CO2 fractional laser and intense pulsed light in the treatment of facial photoaging. Methods A total of 100 patients with facial photoaging admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2018 were randomly divided into control group and observation group， with 50 patients in each group. The control group was treated with intense pulsed light， and the observation group was treated with CO2 fractional laser. The therapeutic effect， incidence of adverse reactions and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 96.00%， which was higher than 84.00% in the control group （P
【Key words】CO2 fractional laser； Intense pulsed light； Facial photoaging
日光中的UVB（ultraxiolet radiation B）和UVA（ultraxiolet radiation A）對(duì)皮膚組織形成的結(jié)構(gòu)破壞是導(dǎo)致皮膚老化的主要原因，會(huì)導(dǎo)致皮膚出現(xiàn)松弛、粗糙及毛細(xì)血管擴(kuò)張等情況，對(duì)美觀性造成較大影響[1]。（剩余4173字）