對(duì)我國(guó)生態(tài)文明建設(shè)領(lǐng)域?yàn)^職犯罪立法的再思考

摘要：當(dāng)前我國(guó)生態(tài)文明建設(shè)領(lǐng)域?yàn)^職罪的立法存在傳統(tǒng)結(jié)果犯立法模式，法條競(jìng)合處理不符合生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的要求，未直接保護(hù)生態(tài)法益，法定刑過(guò)輕等問(wèn)題。為此，應(yīng)在堅(jiān)持生態(tài)法益為危害結(jié)果內(nèi)容、理順?lè)l競(jìng)合關(guān)系、將生態(tài)法益作為直接保護(hù)對(duì)象、提高法定刑等原則的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)相關(guān)法律進(jìn)行修改。

關(guān)鍵詞：生態(tài)文明建設(shè)；瀆職罪；立法原則；立法建議

中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)：D924.393文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A文章編號(hào)：2095-6916（2023）17-0067-04

Reconsideration of the Legislation on Malfeasance Crime

in the Field of Ecological Civilization Construction in China

Shuai Qinghua1Fu Mingming2

（1. School of Law， Nanchang Hangkong University， Nanchang 330063;

2. People’s Procuratorate of Siming District in Xiamen， Xiamen 361005）

Abstract： The current legislation on malfeasance crime in the field of ecological civilization construction in China has problems such as traditional legislative models for consequential offenses， conflicting legal provisions that do not meet the requirements of ecological civilization construction， failure to directly protect ecological legal interests， and excessively light statutory penalties. Therefore， based on the principles of upholding ecological legal interests as the content of harmful outcomes， harmonizing conflicting legal provisions， making ecological legal interests a direct protection object， and increasing statutory penalties， relevant laws should be modified.

Keywords： ecological civilization construction; malfeasance crime; legislative principles; legislative suggestions

刑法是保障我國(guó)生態(tài)文明建設(shè)最嚴(yán)厲的手段，通過(guò)刑法手段促使環(huán)境執(zhí)法者依法執(zhí)法，有利于有效規(guī)范生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的秩序，穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)我國(guó)生態(tài)文明建設(shè)發(fā)展。（剩余5651字）