微通道與超微通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)治療CT值 ?800HU 單發(fā)兒童腎盂結(jié)石療效的比較

打開文本圖片集

Comparison of the efficacy of mini and super mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of single pediatric renal pelvis stones with CT value ?800 HU

AINIWAER Aierken， KAHAERMAN Silamu，REXIATI Reheman，MAWUSUMU Mamute，XU Hai， JIASUER Batuer （Department of Urology，The First People's Hospital of Kashgar Region，Kashgar 8440oo，China）

ABSTRACT：Objective To compare theclinical eficacy of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy （mPCNL）and super mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy（SMP） in the treatment of single pediatric renal pelvis stones with CT value ，to providereference for the diagnosis and treatmentof children with such low-density stones.MethodsTheclinical dataof 74 children with single renal pelvis stones （1.0-2.5cm in size，CT value ?800HU ） treated in our hospital during Jan.2ol5 and Dec.202l were retrospectively，with the subjects divided into mPCNL group （ n=39 ）and SMP group（ n=35 ）based on the surgicalmethods.Theoperation time，decrease inhemoglobin 2hoursaftersurgeryhospital tay，stoneclearancerate，tubele rate，and theincidence ofcomplications（fever，mild renal pelvis injury）were compared betwen thetwo groups.ResultsThe operation time [（45.5±20.1） min vs. （59.8±13.6） ）min， P<0.001] and average hospital stay [（7.1±1.4） d ′s.（11.1±2.6） d， P<0.001] were shorter in the SMP group than in the mPCNL group，while the tubeless rate （68.6% vs. 10.3% P<0.001 ） was higher.There were no significant diferences inthe hemoglobin 2hours aftersurgeryand stoneclearancerateatl month after surgery between the two groups （ P>0.05） . No blood transfusion was required in either group.Fever ） occured in1caseand mildrenal pelvis perforation occurred in2 cases in the SMP group，while feveroccurred in cases and mildrenalpelvis perforation occurred in 3cases in the mPCNL group，with no significant diference between the two groups （ 8.6% vs. 12.8% P=0.556 ）. ConclusionThe mPCNL and SMP have comparable efficacy in the treatment of single pediatric renal pelvis stones with CT value ?800 HU，but SMP has advantages of shorter operation time，shorter average hospital stay，and higher tubeless rate.

KEY WORDS：supermini percutaneous nephrolithotomy;mini percutaneous nepholithotomy;CTvalue;children；renal pelvis stone

摘要：目的比較微通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)（mPCNL）與超微通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)（SMP）治療CT值 ?800 HU的單發(fā)兒童腎盂結(jié)石的臨床療效，為低密度腎盂結(jié)石患兒的診治提供參考。（剩余8368字）